If you have the stomach for it, I've just read a really interesting article about the disappearance of female bodily hair and what it means. It brings together a lot of strong arguments, many of which I hadn't thought of before, and makes comparisons to how hair has been perceived throughout history as well. I found it really fascinating, but be warned – it is quite graphic.
Disappearance by Roger Friedland
Monday, 30 April 2012
Saturday, 28 April 2012
On Appearances
“After all, I know I’m no match for This
Morning’s pulchritudinous host Holly Willoughby, nor are male
politicians spared ridicule about their looks (even I have noted David
Cameron’s startling resemblance to Henry from Thomas the Tank Engine.)
But there is a difference in the treatment of men and women here.
A A Gill didn’t just mock Mary Beard’s hair, he suggested she
shouldn’t be on our screens at all. Similarly, my not looking like Rosie
Huntington-Whiteley was seen as a weapon to invalidate my opinions —
something that doesn’t happen to equally genetically challenged male
commentators. Beard has given a perfect illustration of how to handle
such criticism, though: women mustn’t let the b******s win.”
Yes! This is exactly the difference
between the way that women’s appearance is commented on and the way that
men’s is. There was an article by Bryony Gordon in The Telegraph
arguing that men are judged on their looks as well, it’s just that we
choose to ignore it. This argument misses the point entirely. If a
comment is made on a man’s appearance, such as the example she used
about David Cameron looking like ham, then it doesn’t imply that because
of the way they look, they are not qualified to do their job or have an
opinion. However, if a woman’s appearance is commented on, such Rosamund Urwin who wrote this article
being called too ugly to be a stripper, then it is a way to bar them
from having an opinion. It shuts them up, undermines them, and implies
that they are not qualified to be in the position they are in. That is
the difference between commenting on a man’s appearance and commenting
on a woman’s.
Top Girl, The Game Where Makeovers Are Mandatory and Being Hot Is Everything
“And I was disgusted: young girls already get the idea that looks and
possessions matter more than personal achievements and healthy
relationships from movies, TV, popular music, tabloids online and off,
teen magazines, and every sort of advertising. Do they need games to
reinforce that, too?” (via Jezebel)
This is so true. Games aimed at boys (as they have been for most of
the time they’ve been around) are about achievements, about challenges,
about beating levels and bosses and being the strongest or the most
intelligent. Are games aimed at girls just going to be, as this one is,
about being the prettiest, the most popular, having the most boys try to
chat you up?
For another terrible example of a typical game aimed at young girls, there is this game where all you have to do is kiss Justin Bieber. That’s the whole game.
Please please please let’s not do this – for one thing, these games are SO BORING. People like Jane McGonigal have argued that games can encourage creativity and learning, but I don’t see any redeeming qualities about games like these whatsoever. Sure, young girls like them and play them, but is it good for them? Aren’t there other games that are far better that they would equally enjoy, if only they knew they were allowed to play them?
The media focuses so much on the effect of violence in videogames on young boys; how about focussing on the corrosive effects of ‘games’ that tell young girls that they are only useful if they are pink, pretty and have as many possessions as they possibly can?
For another terrible example of a typical game aimed at young girls, there is this game where all you have to do is kiss Justin Bieber. That’s the whole game.
Please please please let’s not do this – for one thing, these games are SO BORING. People like Jane McGonigal have argued that games can encourage creativity and learning, but I don’t see any redeeming qualities about games like these whatsoever. Sure, young girls like them and play them, but is it good for them? Aren’t there other games that are far better that they would equally enjoy, if only they knew they were allowed to play them?
The media focuses so much on the effect of violence in videogames on young boys; how about focussing on the corrosive effects of ‘games’ that tell young girls that they are only useful if they are pink, pretty and have as many possessions as they possibly can?
Friday, 27 April 2012
The Best Performance Poet You Will Ever Hear
Seriously, if you've never listened to Sonya Renee's poetry, you need to go and rectify that mistake right now. I'd heard 'What Women Deserve' before, but didn't realise she had a whole YouTube backlist of her poetry performances. If you think poetry is dry, or boring, or useless, that it can never teach you anything, or be inspiring, or make you think, then begin with 'Slices', a horrified ode to the strangely American phenomenon of fake cheese. Just listening to her rhythm makes me want to match it in my writing, infiltrates the voice in my head, makes me hear her as a type. Listen to her.
Labels:
amazing,
fake cheese,
inspiring,
performance poet,
performance poetry,
performing,
poetry,
powerful,
Slices,
Sonya Renee,
speaking,
speech,
spoken word,
thinking,
What Women Deserve,
women,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)